Our Editorial Standards
We are committed to delivering accurate, evidence-based information about plant-based nutrition for women. Our editorial process reflects the highest standards of journalism and scientific integrity.
Every article you read here has been researched, fact-checked, and reviewed by our editorial board to ensure reliability and relevance.
The information on this site is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.
Our Editorial Principles
Evidence-Based Research
All content is grounded in peer-reviewed scientific studies, nutrition research, and authoritative sources. We prioritize recent findings while acknowledging established nutritional science. Every health claim is traced to credible research and cited appropriately.
Transparency & Disclosure
We disclose potential conflicts of interest, affiliate relationships, and funding sources. Our editorial team is independent and not influenced by advertisers or commercial interests. Sponsored content is clearly labeled as such.
Balanced Perspective
We present multiple viewpoints on nutrition topics and acknowledge areas of scientific debate. When experts disagree, we explain the different positions fairly. We avoid sensationalism and present information in proper context.
Inclusivity & Accessibility
Our articles address the diverse experiences of women across different cultures, ages, health statuses, and dietary preferences. We recognize that one-size-fits-all nutritional advice does not serve everyone. We aim to make complex information understandable to general readers.
Our Fact-Checking Process
Research & Sourcing
Writers begin by consulting peer-reviewed journals, government nutrition databases, and recognized research institutions. We prioritize studies published in the last five years while maintaining awareness of foundational nutritional science. All sources are documented for verification.
Expert Review
Every article is reviewed by at least one member of our Editorial Advisory Board before publication. Reviewers check claims against source material, verify citations, and assess scientific accuracy. Controversial topics receive additional expert scrutiny.
Editorial Verification
Our editorial team independently verifies key facts, checks for logical consistency, and ensures citations are accurate. We test recipes and preparation instructions where applicable. Any claims that cannot be substantiated are removed or qualified with appropriate language.
Ongoing Monitoring
Published articles are reviewed periodically to ensure they remain current and accurate. When new research contradicts previous information, we update articles and note the change transparently. Outdated articles are either updated or clearly marked as historical content.
Editorial Advisory Board
Our editorial team comprises nutrition experts, health journalists, and research professionals dedicated to delivering trustworthy content.
Helena Virtanen
Editor-in-Chief, Registered Dietitian
Helena holds a PhD in Nutritional Science from the University of Helsinki. With over twelve years of experience in nutrition research and public education, she oversees all editorial content and ensures scientific integrity.
Miriam Laine
Health & Nutrition Journalist
Miriam is a certified health journalist with fifteen years in science communication. She specializes in translating complex nutritional research into accessible articles and fact-checks all published content before it goes live.
Aleksandra Kowalski
Women's Health Nutritionist
Aleksandra specializes in nutritional approaches to women's health at different life stages. She contributes regular expert reviews and ensures our content addresses the unique nutritional needs of women across all ages and circumstances.
Jukka Mäkinen
Food Science Researcher
Jukka conducts research in plant-based nutrition and food composition at a leading Nordic research institute. He provides expert guidance on technical nutrition topics and verifies nutritional claims and recipe information.
Corrections & Updates Policy
How We Handle Errors
We are committed to accuracy and take errors seriously. All corrections are made promptly and transparently.
- Factual errors: When we discover incorrect information, we correct it immediately and add a note at the end of the article explaining the correction and the date it was made.
- Scientific updates: When new research contradicts previous information, we update the article to reflect current evidence and add a dated note explaining the scientific development.
- Clarity improvements: If readers report that an article is confusing or unclear, we revise it for better understanding and note that we have improved clarity.
- Recipe or instruction errors: Any mistakes in recipes, preparation methods, or nutritional calculations are corrected immediately with a clear note of the change.
How to Report an Error
We welcome reader feedback and take all reports of potential errors seriously. If you believe an article contains inaccurate information, please send us detailed feedback including:
- • The article title and URL
- • The specific claim or passage you believe is incorrect
- • Your evidence or source for the correction
- • Your contact information (optional but helpful)
Send corrections to: [email protected]
Our Response Timeline
We aim to acknowledge error reports within 48 hours and make corrections within one week of verification. For urgent health-related errors, we work faster to ensure reader safety.
How Corrections Appear
All corrections appear as a dated note within the article, typically at the bottom, using clear language like: "Editor's note (updated January 15, 2025): This section was corrected to reflect the latest research on [topic]."
Our Content Guidelines
Evidence Standards
We rely on peer-reviewed research, government health agencies, and authoritative professional organizations. Personal anecdotes are presented as experiences, not proof. We distinguish between established science and emerging research.
Individual Variation
We acknowledge that nutritional needs vary between individuals. Recommendations are framed appropriately, and we encourage readers to consider their personal circumstances and consult relevant professionals as needed.
Inclusive Language
We use language that respects diverse backgrounds, abilities, and experiences. We avoid stereotypes and ensure our articles are relevant to women of different ages, cultures, socioeconomic backgrounds, and health statuses.
Citation Accuracy
Every factual claim is supported by a source. Citations include author, publication, date, and where possible, a link to the original research. We do not cite sources we have not reviewed ourselves.
Conflict Disclosure
If an author or reviewer has a financial interest related to the topic, we disclose it. We do not publish content where undisclosed conflicts might undermine credibility.
Regular Review
Popular articles are reviewed annually to ensure content remains current. If significant new research emerges, articles are updated promptly. Articles older than three years are flagged as historical reference material.
Questions About Our Standards?
We value reader feedback and questions about our editorial process. Whether you have a suggestion for improvement, a concern about an article, or want to know more about our standards, we are here to help.
Email us: [email protected]
Address: Mannerheimintie 21, Turku, Finland
Phone: +358 083 593 916